http://www.insanitytheory.net/kitchenwench/digital-editing-101-working-out-the-basics/ Feeding friends and family, one recipe at a time Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:59:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.insanitytheory.net/kitchenwench/digital-editing-101-working-out-the-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-5176 Ellie Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:44:57 +0000 http://www.insanitytheory.net/kitchenwench/digital-editing-101-working-out-the-basics/#comment-5176 My pleasure, Mike :) I'm glad you found this helpful :) My pleasure, Mike I’m glad you found this helpful

]]> http://www.insanitytheory.net/kitchenwench/digital-editing-101-working-out-the-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-5077 mike Thu, 22 Dec 2011 03:10:00 +0000 http://www.insanitytheory.net/kitchenwench/digital-editing-101-working-out-the-basics/#comment-5077 great article. i have a background in video production and graphic design however, as silly as it may sound, photo editing is something i wanted some direction in. this is the first article that showed the basic principles of photo editing. (the five key things to look for was exactly what i was looking for) Thank you. great article. i have a background in video production and graphic design however, as silly as it may sound, photo editing is something i wanted some direction in. this is the first article that showed the basic principles of photo editing. (the five key things to look for was exactly what i was looking for) Thank you.

]]> http://www.insanitytheory.net/kitchenwench/digital-editing-101-working-out-the-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-1831 Ellie Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:17:39 +0000 http://www.insanitytheory.net/kitchenwench/digital-editing-101-working-out-the-basics/#comment-1831 I definitely recommend Adobe Lightroom - it's cheaper than Photoshop and is completely loss less because it doesn't actually alter the photo file in any way, so that if you do stuff things up while editing, you can always backtrack to the original image :) I definitely recommend Adobe Lightroom – it’s cheaper than Photoshop and is completely loss less because it doesn’t actually alter the photo file in any way, so that if you do stuff things up while editing, you can always backtrack to the original image

]]> http://www.insanitytheory.net/kitchenwench/digital-editing-101-working-out-the-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-1830 Ellie Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:16:08 +0000 http://www.insanitytheory.net/kitchenwench/digital-editing-101-working-out-the-basics/#comment-1830 Photoshop is a fantastic tool, but the complexity of the program and the amount of knowledge/skill required means that it's not that fantastic for those of us who aren't familiar with how to use every aspect of it. That's why I actually think that Adobe Lightroom is a better tool to use for those who are only interested in doing minor edits to their photographs. Photoshop is a fantastic tool, but the complexity of the program and the amount of knowledge/skill required means that it’s not that fantastic for those of us who aren’t familiar with how to use every aspect of it. That’s why I actually think that Adobe Lightroom is a better tool to use for those who are only interested in doing minor edits to their photographs.

]]> http://www.insanitytheory.net/kitchenwench/digital-editing-101-working-out-the-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-1826 Jim Sun, 27 Mar 2011 00:40:33 +0000 http://www.insanitytheory.net/kitchenwench/digital-editing-101-working-out-the-basics/#comment-1826 Just when I thought I was getting close to figuring out this lossy & lossless stuff I thought that since PS is so expensive that it was non-destructive. I had read once about Lightroom being non-destructive, well back to the books. Why am I so hungry after reading this article, hmmmmm. Just when I thought I was getting close to figuring out this lossy & lossless stuff I thought that since PS is so expensive that it was non-destructive. I had read once about Lightroom being non-destructive, well back to the books. Why am I so hungry after reading this article, hmmmmm.

]]>